In
our last blog entry we talked about musical inspiration — where it comes from
and what it can result in. A two-measure phrase and groove had entered my head
at that time, and I decided to try to expand it into a new work that could be
premiered at a Hamilton College concert on September 6. The two-bar phrase that
came to me on my morning walk looked like this as first notated:
It
wasn’t much to go on, and the manuscript sat on the piano for a day or two
until I had time to look at it and begin the real work of composing. How do you
take a promising phrase and turn it into a composition with enough length and
musical content to be worthy of a public performance? Finding a form is
helpful. Most compositions in the jazz realm are written in a fairly specific
form, at least mine have been. I’ve written my share of 12-bar blues, and a
number of songs that fit into the 32-bar song form, a template dating back to
the 1930’s. It’s a convenient form. An 8-bar A section and a repeat of it, a new
8-bar B section, then followed by a repeat of the initial A section. This
magically turns 16 bars of composition into 32. This was the form that seemed
to present itself as I worked on expanding the initial idea.
The
restrictions in this particular case were considerable. The concert format was
for a soloist and accompanist, with a preferred time limit of four to five
minutes. This limited instrumentation presented a challenge, because two single
note instruments would have to provide melody, harmony and rhythm. To achieve a
Latin feel that would set up the melody, I employed percussive effects, the
string bassist tapping on his instrument and the saxophonist clicking out a
separate rhythm on a maraca tied to his belt. As the composer and saxophonist,
I knew there were certain notes I could write for just my left hand on the sax,
while I tapped the maraca with my right. In addition, I knew that the bass
player could tap on his bass while he plucked his instrument, as long as I
wrote the part for an open string. These types of details fit into the realm of
knowing orchestral instruments and their capabilities.
The
song took form and the 2-bar idea developed into 4, then 8. The melody remained
in the saxophone and the bass provided root notes and a generic Latin groove.
The three eighth notes at the end of bars 4 and 8 grew in importance as the
piece progressed. The 8-bar A section looked like this:
The
bridge led me to a distant key, presenting a challenge to return to the
original , and I must admit this was one of the more jarring transitions I have
written. I refer to this as “the Andrew Lloyd Weber modulation,” which consists
of no modulation at all, just an abrupt return from whence you came.
For
a number of years now I have composed directly into the Finale musical software
program, occasionally going to the piano to check things before I notate them.
Finale’s reproduction is fairly realistic, and you get a decent idea of what
the piece will sound like. The piece needed some contrast and a bit more
length, so a section employing a dramatic tremolo/arco bass sound served as an
introduction and ending.
When
the piece was 90 percent completed I called the bass player to set up a
rehearsal, and tried to put it out of my mind for the time being. Most of the
work was done, but the song did not have a title. Some time ago I wrote a
separate blog called “Instrumental Song Titles,” and how difficult they can be
to think of unless a composition is dedicated to a person or event. While the
song had a Latin feel, it did not have any distinct reason for being, nor was
it composed with something specific in mind. I could have called it “Walking
the Dog,” because the initial melody occurred to me while I was doing just
that. I dismissed the idea because (1) it would seem inappropriate included on
a program for a classical concert; and (2) Rufus Thomas already wrote “Walking
the Dog” some 50 years ago. I wanted this title to have a Latin flavor to it so
I decided to take the now-important rhythm — three eighth notes — from the
piece and translated it into Spanish. After consulting someone who knew the
language and proper grammar, the title became “Las tres corcheas.” I liked it,
and I thought it might make people ponder about a hidden meaning in the song,
of which there is none.
Due
to scheduling issues, our rehearsal became a run through that very afternoon
before the performance. I was not concerned. The bassist, Darryl Pugh from
Syracuse, is a highly skilled musician, comfortable in classical, jazz and
Latin genres.
The
piece was well received at the concert and came out sounding very close to the
way I envisioned it. The fewer instruments you are using the more likely you
are to get the result you heard in your head.
The
premier of the piece could very well be its only performance, as often
compositions written for specific occasions are played only once. You can take
a listen to the piece as an MP3 here, as the Finale program plays it. You will
hear a two second gap at 1:48, where the solo sections were inserted during the
performance.
For
me, inspiration for composing seems to arrive when everything I’ve ever heard,
played or previously written collides in my head. If I’m lucky, a new phrase
synergistically finds its way out.