Next
week I will travel to Atlanta for the annual JazzEd Network conference. This
association quickly stepped in when the International Association of Jazz
Educators went bankrupt in 2008. If a journalist wanted to write an article
about the healthy state of one of America’s original art forms, this would be
the event to attend. Educators, performers, students, and entrepreneurs will
convene for four days of concerts, clinics and commerce. The jazz glass will be
overflowing.
Players
and promoters know that this vibrant scene is sadly not mirrored in other
areas. Rick Tessel, the publisher of JazzEd Magazine, recently authored “The
Paradox of Today’s Jazz Scene.” He pointed out the inequalities, citing
statistics and focusing on the fact that high schools, middle schools, and
conservatories have students studying jazz more than ever before. At the same
time, the jazz audience is shrinking, especially under the age of 45, according
to the Jazz Audience Initiative. The record industry is suffering as well, and
jazz recordings account for less than 3% of total music sales. Mr. Tessel cites
possible reasons, including the proliferation of music on the internet, and the
fact that “younger buyers seem to be more actively involved in the full range of
music activities, especially downloading and organizing music.” My reading of
this statement is that downloading and organizing have replaced purchasing and
attending. I don’t think any observers of the jazz scene are surprised by this
paradox.
Saxophonist/composer
Jane Ira Bloom recognized the situation with recordings back in 1998 when I
interviewed her for the Jazz Archive.
MR: Yesterday
I overheard you talking about recording albums and the business of finding
labels, and you had mentioned that the business for records these days is not
too healthy in the jazz world and that the time you’re getting to make records
is getting smaller.
Jane Ira Bloom |
JB: Yeah.
Well this is the middle, the jazz trenches, we’re not talking about the major
jazz labels, we’re talking about all the independent jazz labels that live and
operate in this kind of middle ground, on very small budgets. And the fact is
it’s become so easy to make a CD now, everybody can make one, anybody can make
a CD and get it out there and reproduce it and get it in the record stores. And
I’m not entirely sure what that says about the quality and the content of
what’s in those CD’s if they’re so easy to do, how carefully we think about
what it is that we record and want to put out there. There is also a lot of other
entertainment options for people who buy CD’s now, you know the computer and
internet has changed all kinds of things. And entertainment options people
have, not just listening to records. People can barely listen to 60 minutes of
music, they don’t have that amount of time. An LP used to be 40 minutes. People
could handle that. Jazz critics say today that they don’t even have time to
listen to an entire CD when they’re evaluating new albums. It takes a lot of
time.
MR: Yeah.
You get a stack of CD’s on your desk that you’re supposed to review and each
one of them is an hour.
JB: Yeah.
It also brings up the point of, you know, how carefully are you thinking about
what you are recording, how special you want to make those musical moments.
Bob
Kinkel, a founding members of the TransSiberian Orchestra, and my most recent
interviewee, succinctly addressed the easy accessibility of current technology:
Bob Kinkel |
BK: My
view of technology and the way it’s gotten so much easier to do it in all forms
— like graphic design, art, music recording — it’s really easy to get to high
mediocrity. And unfortunately that is where a lot of people stay and it’s very
rare that people are popping above that with any kind of design. It’s like I’m
happy that a lot of the top architectural schools are making everybody do stuff
by hand again before they’ll let them take whatever design they did by hand and
put into CAD programs. So it’s more using it as a tool instead of the creative
crutch, because it’s so easy to get to get high mediocrity.
It’s
hard to imagine that the connection between slumping record sales and concert
attendance is not one of the consequences of the astounding leaps in
technology. Recently I related to my most accomplished saxophone student the
thrill of seeing Cannonball Adderley in live shows in the late 1960’s. His
reply was “oh yes, I’ve seen him on YouTube.” My saxophone teacher about that
same time would recommend to me different artists to listen to and absorb. My
process would be to save up money from my allowance and go to the record store to
pore through the offerings, making my most informed choice possible. The
prodigious liner notes on the album jackets assisted in my selections. I also
listened to my transistor radio late at night where I heard the all-night jazz
station in Rochester, New York. All of the above are now just a click away.
Very
few young musicians would ever need or want to recreate the effort that Phil
Woods talked about in our interview from 1999.
Phil Woods |
PW: Before
I graduated, I was still in high school. And we’d come down, we’d take the bus
to New York and we’d have to take another subway out to Long Island and then a
bus to Lennie’s [Tristano] house, and I forget what it was, it was $15 a lesson
or something, which seemed like a lot of bread in those days. I’d take a lesson
then go back to Manhattan and go to Romeo’s and get a bowl of spaghetti, and
you knew it was fresh because it’d been sitting in the window all day, and then
we’d go to Mainstream Records and get the latest Bud and Bird and Diz, whatever
we could afford. They were 78’s of course in those days. And if we still have a
dollar left over we’d go to 52nd Street. I could get a Coca Cola for
a dollar and I could sit there all night man. And that’s where I first heard
Charlie Parker. I think he was sitting in with Milt Jackson I believe and
Howard McGhee.
If
I suggest to my saxophone students today that they would benefit from listening
to a certain artist, my expectation used to be that the student would seek them
out and purchase select recordings. Suppose I suggest that John Coltrane is the
important artist. My Google search yielded the following on the first page
offering: A live recording of John playing “Naima,” a live recording of “My
Favorite Things,” the full version of “Blue Trane” with moving photo gallery,
and a version of “Giant Steps” with an animated solo, the notes appearing one
after the other, in real time, complete with chord changes. Most Coltrane fans
would agree that these four songs belong on the short list of his notable
recordings. Will the average student feel compelled to purchase this music? Why
should they?
Let’s
look at a current artist. Eric Alexander is an accomplished saxophonist,
influenced by John Coltrane amongst others. Eric’s Google search offers a
treasure trove of video and audio. One particular link has 32 different videos
of Eric performing. What about live concerts? If a student desires to see an
actual live performance, he/she can visit Small’s website, and for $5 a month
live jazz from the club can be viewed every night. Is the experience the same
as actually being in a jazz club? Of course not. However, it’s very close, and
costs next to nothing. Let’s face it, the days of going to extraordinary
measures for your jazz education are long gone, except for paying extraordinary
tuition.
My
intention here is not to sound like a “moldy fig,” the term used to describe
purists who dismissed any attempts to modernize jazz in the 30’s. The
discrepancy between the separate sides of jazz provide a fertile topic for
music journalists and the occasional sociology paper. I believe most of the
situation can be explained by the adage “what we receive too cheap, we esteem
too little.”
There
is little doubt that the JazzEd conference at the Hyatt Regency Atlanta will be
stimulating and upbeat. If you attend, please consider my presentation on
Friday, January 4, 2013, at 10 a.m. in the Learning Center. I will host a
screening of the film “Joe Williams: A Portrait in Song.” Hamilton College
produced this concert documentary in 1996, featuring Joe with the Count Basie
Orchestra. Expect a review on the conference in our next posting.
1) I do think it's very "older generation" to blame "technology" in cases like these. If the question presented is, "Why is the jazz audience is shrinking, especially under the age of 45, especially given the fact that high schools, middle schools, and conservatories have students studying jazz more than ever before?", then I think the question has answered itself. Students want to play music they think is cool, hip, progressive, exciting, etc. Music that is the subject of school study, especially at the middle school and high school levels, by that very nature lacks any of the trappings of music that is cool, hip, progressive, and exciting. That's a plausible perception, anyway, when jazz is presented in the same context as symphonic music, which young people also generally think of as "dead." Schools generally aren't teaching music that is currently popular. When an art form becomes codified in general school curricula, young people tend to assume there isn't new and exciting work to be done in that genre. (There's a Miles idea at play here, in that the mass institutionalization and teaching of jazz indicates that jazz has slowed down, stopped evolving, and stopped having a current, forward-looking relevance.) I don't have the answer on how to save jazz, but I don't think that "technology" is a big problem for jazz, except to the extent it presents challenges to professional performers' attempts to make a living, but that's an issue that affects all musicians, and many other professional fields too. (Of course, I agree with the adage that "what we receive too cheap, we esteem to little," I just don't think jazz's dwindling popularity is due to increased ease of access.)
ReplyDelete2) I am living and working in Atlanta. It may be difficult to slide out of work for a 10:00 am screening, but I'll take a swing at it.
-Alec
Alec – thanks for your thoughtful comments. I agree that jazz or any art form that becomes mainstreamed and subject to dissection can lose some of its mystery and appeal. By elevating jazz to the art status of classical music, we have accorded it its rightful place as an original American art form, but burdened it with the trappings of the concert hall and academe. But it’s been my observation that educators are doing their best to make their jazz programs hip and reflective of musical trends. For example, The Gordon Goodwin Big Phat Band produces challenging and modern charts that are widely in demand, and arrangers are quick to utilize pop hits as vehicles for jazz ensembles. I don’t think the average student thinks of jazz as being a dead art form, as they might about concert band and classical music.
ReplyDeleteTechnology is not the primary cause for the inequity in jazz record sales and concert attendance, but it is an obvious contributor. The latest example is the proliferation of free on-line play-along tracks for practicing which can be useful for both amateurs and teachers. I can’t imagine that Jamey Abersold, the “King of Play-Along Marketing,” is pleased to see versions of what he sells available for free to his potential customers. Technology has always caused disruption in music marketing, but up until this point the customer has always had to pay for the new medium (e.g. LP’s being replaced by CD’s, etc). Now the direct revenue stream back to the artist can be easily bypassed.
Thanks again for your observations. You might want to check this link regarding the JazzEd conference: http://www.jazzednet.org/1/en/2013_Conference_Registration
Monk